Islands in the Stream, a song by Dolly Parton and Kenny Rogers, evokes the imagery of being isolated together on an island. While listening to that song I wondered with whom, besides Scott, I would like to be cast on an island.
So, first I queried a number of friends and was cheered, delighted and heartened to learn the overwhelming response was the desire to spend the time with a loved one, for many caring and tender reasons and not just because only a loved one would tolerate one’s quirks.
Satisfied that love still rules the world, I then went on line to retrieve the world’s most popular responses and was surprised at the answers. Survival skills was at the top of the list, of course, but in a way that I had not considered:
On line, Queen Elizabeth garnered over one thousand wants (albeit this question was asked while she was still alive). Nonetheless, the gist of these responses was similar: “Not only is she basically immortal and would be entertaining, if she randomly went missing one day it would obviously be the top news headline, and there would be a massive worldwide search party to try and find her and, of course, me.” Of course. The brilliance of the logic is unassailable. After all, if I go missing it’s a mild ‘meh’, if she goes missing the world looks for her and whoever she is with.
The most recent, and most similar, response on line was to spend time with President Trump. He was the top hit and for as similar reason as the Queen: “If Mr. Trump goes missing, everyone would go crazy and surely they will send troops in order to find him”. One person went further to say: “and while they come, I could actually talk to this businessman and learn some stuff.” Again, brilliant and impressively self serving. The same logic is probably true with any president, except maybe Grover Cleveland, but that's another story.
Neither the late Queen nor the current President would have been on my list. However heralded these people might be, they can’t do anything for themselves other than to ask someone else to take care of the problem. I suppose the Queen could trade some of her jewels with the natives for food and shelter and the President could negotiate a deal but in the long run, what? Neither they, nor anyone of their ilk, are self-reliant. Heck, the Queen even had someone to break in her new shoes before she wore them.
MacGyver was another whole hearted contender. He had it all in terms of required needs: Survival Skills: building shelters, finding food and water would be invaluable; Medical Knowledge: treating injuries or illnesses that might arise on the island; Problem-Solving Skills: resourceful, good critical thinking, devising plans for survival and potential rescue; Physical Fitness: required for the demands of survival, including foraging, building, and potentially swimming to safety if necessary. No question that MacGyver is all that, but when the sun goes down, would this guy keep my confidence up, be a soft voiced story teller by the fire that he so expertly built? Small talk was not his forte. Yes, he would keep my body alive, but what about my spirit?
Asking friends the same question again after asking to omit a loved one, I wasn’t surprised at the choice of the famous intellectual people with whom to spend time on an island. While being in the same room with any one of these people would be the gift of a lifetime, I cannot imagine what I would have to offer in terms of reciprocal conversation. Therein lies the rub. What could I possibly say that would hold their attention for more than a few seconds. What remarks from me could possibly engage their fancy? What brilliance could escape my lips to charm them? “Did I tell you about the time that I wore mismatched shoes?” Nope.
So, moving on, in order of listings, these were the responses and my responses to their responses:
Winston Churchill was most often listed. This is a man who ad libs: "He has all of the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire.” Or, more soberly: "If you are going through hell, keep going”. His famous stare alone would render me speechless. At best I could offer to light his cigar so he’s crossed off my list.
Albert Einstein came next on the list: “Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited; imagination encircles the world”. To which I would respond. . . . Duh. Even his Scrabble game words would do me in. What could I say: who does your hair?
Stephen Hawking: “One, remember to look up at the stars and not down at your feet. Two, never give up work. Work gives you meaning and purpose and life is empty without it. Three, if you are lucky enough to find love, remember it is there and don't throw it away.” So I asked. . . . can I oil your wheelchair? Whose voice is recorded in your translator box?
Umberto Eco: Really? This one threw me. I did not see this guy in the top 10. Eco’s elucidation of fascism would leave me speechless. He considered himself a professor and was quite unsettled with the fact that people referred to him as a novelist. I did like The Name of the Rose. However, he does not strike me as a nice guy.“There are four kinds of people in this world: cretins, fools, morons, and lunatics.” Yikes. I suppose that he’s an acquired taste, like Oscar Levant but without the snide asides. Even though we're both Italian, he didn't make my list.
Richard Dawkins. I’d never heard of this guy (great intellectual that I am). Like Hawking, Dawkins doesn’t believe in God. Dawkins is famous for his work in evolutionary biology, particularly his concept of the gene as the primary unit of selection in evolution; the gene? I thought (again, not the great intellectual) evolutionary biology had to do with animal magnetism as the primary unit of natural selection. You know: Man clubs woman, drags her to his tent, makes boom boom. I’d always thought that if I was ever in the same room as Jeremy Irons, I blush to consider the outcome if he would allow me to have my way with him, but not according to Dawkins. Clearly, I don’t understand the entire gene evolution theory since it took a second husband to get the basic biology stuff right.
After the Queen, the top female on the list was Ada Lovelace. “The science of operations, as derived from mathematics more especially, is a science of itself, and has its own abstract truth and value.” She’s considered the first computer programmer. Oh my. Fortunately, I’m married to a computer genius so he’s my translator. I’m good with handing Scott my computer whenever there’s a problem, otherwise, ctrl-alt-del is as far as I could go with her. Then again, she was Lord Byron’s daughter so there might be a non-science recessive gene in there somewhere (what would Dawkins say about her?). Either way, what would I offer her in terms of reciprocal conversation. How do you keep your starchy crinolines from scratching your legs?
On the list went, while other equally brilliant minds followed: Elon Musk, Marie Curie, Lise Meitner, Maria Montessori. Again, what would I say? What would any of us say. And a few smart alecks named Confucius, Aristotle, Pythagorus, Plato and Socrates. Those Greek philosophers? After ‘I think therefore I am’, I’ve got nothing.
Now that we’ve established that I have nothing to say to hold these brilliant minds’ interest, the question still hanging is who, besides Scott, would I want to spend my days with on an island? Obviously, Keith Richards.